Comparison

SCOUTVERSE vs traditional scouting

We are not trying to replace your scouts. We are trying to stop them spending 80% of their week on search instead of judgement — and to give them coverage of markets your department does not staff.

Coverage

Traditional: limited to the leagues you have people in. Every uncovered market is one where a competitor signs cheaper.

SCOUTVERSE: every published profile worldwide is scored against your brief continuously, including markets you have never staffed.

Speed

Traditional: a longlist takes weeks of viewing and note collation.

SCOUTVERSE: a brief returns a ranked longlist immediately; your scouts start at the watching stage instead of the searching stage.

Consistency

Traditional: two scouts rarely produce comparable documents on the same player.

SCOUTVERSE: shared attribute scoring means a shortlist can be read side by side, and reports follow one structure.

Cost

Traditional: salaries, travel and subscriptions across multiple territories.

SCOUTVERSE: a fixed monthly plan — €149 for an individual scout, €890 for a club department with shared seats. Neither replaces travel entirely; both reduce how much of it is speculative.

What we will not claim

Software cannot judge temperament, dressing-room fit, injury-history nuance or whether a nineteen-year-old will settle in a new country. Those decisions stay with your staff.

An index reflects the data it is given: a profile with thin footage gets scored on thin evidence. Automation narrows the field — humans still sign the player.

Ready to start? Players list themselves free — clubs and scouts unlock the full index on a plan.

See plans